
A New Possibility Opens
I was on the phone with a circle of 7 women. Into one of our fertile moments of silence, Bonnie shared her story of having just come back from 4 days with 8 women whom she had not been with since her high school graduation 47 years ago. It soon became clear to her that the majority of this group was not only Republican, but actually excited about Sarah Palin as candidate for the VP position. Feeling as different as she did, she told us how hard she had to work to stay connected.
After her story she asked, “What do you all think of Sarah Palin? And how do we women begin to sort out how to think and talk about her?” To which, after some silence, Lynda responded: ”I’m open to the possibility that the overall good is being served by her presence at this time.”
It was this comment from Lynda Terry, founder of Vessels of Peace and author of The 11 Intentions: Invoking the Sacred Feminine as a Pathway to Inner Peace, that led to the very enlightening exchange below.
Teresa: Lynda, this is such a powerful and provocative statement. Could you please say a little bit more? For example, what do you mean by the “overall good”? And how do you see Palin serving it?
Lynda: I do not assume, by how something looks - people’s behavior or words - that that is the whole story. This comes from the spiritual journey I have been on in the past several years. It taught me to drop my judgment of others. Then I had to drop my assumptions that my perceptions were reality, then my belief that there was anyone or anything on the planet that was not divine. One thing that helps me remember this is my meditation practice, which I started eighteen years ago. My practice transformed me physically and psychologically, and then began to transform me spiritually. In the many paths on my road - a teacher of meditation, working with women - there was one path into which I delved particularly deeply, and that was this idea that God, or divinity, dwells within each of us. So, now I can look at anyone, and I do mean truly anyone, whether it be Osama Bin Laden or a serial killer or a pedophile. I can. I do. It does not mean that everything they have done is okay. I simply mean that I don’t go to a place of demonizing them, of separating them from me. I am able to accept that there is a reason that that particular behavior or history is playing out in them even though I may not be able to understand it. And I may not condone it.
The other part of it is that I have great trust in, and surrender to, how much I do not know. I am aware that I do not know the greater plan. The miracle of life, the miracle of this planet and this universe is so beyond my human mind’s comprehension of anything. Sure, I can fall into the trap of duality, but it is not where my system of value is based any longer. I only see good.
So when I look at a situation like this election, and Sarah Palin, I see the possibility that her being chosen for this role will enable us to get to the good, get to the next evolution of our consciousness, the next shift in our societies and belief systems quicker, stronger. If that will get us there quicker or more easily than other possibilities might have, then of course that is what I want, because what I want is for us all to keep moving towards that from which we came and the ultimate playing out of that.
Teresa: Did you see the blog that Deepak Chopra wrote about Obama and the Palin Effect? It basically suggests that the rise of Sarah Palin at this time is not surprising as she represents the shadow to Obama’s light. The more Obama evokes the light of hope, change, positive futures, the more likely he is to trigger or attract “the opposite fear, anger, suspicion of the other,” etc. I thought it to be an interesting perspective.
Lynda: I also received the Chopra post from someone. It’s an interesting perspective but still partisan in that his word choices indicate his preference and, in my perception, judgments. I find it surprising that some of his word choices are diminishing of others. Surprising, because I make an assumption that Deepak is a certain way, because of his spirituality. But his rhetoric here does not align with my assumption. (Of course, we all know assumptions are slippery slopes!
)
Still, it brings me back again to this question: What will it take to uplift and transform the level of public discourse in America? How do we offer an appealing alternative to a communications style/habit that many seem to find entertaining or in some other way satisfying in how it separates, wounds and diminishes the dignity and divinity of others?
I have been contemplating this for more than a year now, and what I keep coming to is: 1) It is women who must lead the way, bringing forth this change, and 2) it requires, in part, a going beyond words, into the power of silence, as part of the healing, the solution, the shift. It’s almost as if we have to get still enough, long enough, to do a countrywide smudging, if you will, of the energy all these words have created. There is a long quote about silence and its role in shifting humanity’s consciousness by a 6th century saint, St. Isaac of Spoleto. It starts with: “Silence is the language of the centuries to come.”
It also helps to get clear and put forth core intentions and blessings to the volatile situation we find ourselves in. Here is mine for our upcoming elections.
Election Blessing
May our candidates for the presidency be called to the highest and best in themselves as they travel and share this path. May we, the people of the United States, be called to the highest and best in ourselves as we participate with them in this journey. May we all remember the sacred trust that we’ve been given to hold the dream, not just for ourselves and our country, but for the planet. May we all be blessed with the grace of the Divine and may peace be with us.
Teresa: That is a powerful invocation. I do very much get and appreciate the largeness and wholeness with which you are holding us at this time not as an us/them, but as an Us All, as one body. What is the relationship between what you are speaking of this non-bi-partisanship and making a choice of one candidate and not the other? So, for example, do you vote?
Lynda: Yes, I vote. So I do choose one candidate, ultimately (although sometimes I choose not to choose, in a particular category). I honor the sacred process of contributing my energy to the collective decision the process may not be perfect, but the intention behind it stems from a value I align with: that humanity does better, as a whole, when we participate collectively, as a community, in decisions about where we are going and what we need as a people. What I try my best not to do is generate energy against those I don’t choose. I try to not engage in those kinds of conversations or thoughts or emotions. It’s not easy. But it gets easier over time, with steady intention and practice.
(Part II in next blog post)
Sphere: Related Content